Requesting better error message for ASSERTION FAILED

Using preCICE
1

On suggestion of @uekerman I am opening an issue.

I was trying to run the a 2-way FSI simulation (OpenFOAM +CalculiX, the OF adapter is a bit modified for interFoam).
As for preCICE I use v2,1 and CalculiX adapter with CCXv2.16.
This the precice config that I am using.
precice-config.xml (3.2 KB)

I get the following in CalculiX side:

 Setting up preCICE participant Calculix, using config file: config.yml
---[precice]  This is preCICE version 2.1.0
---[precice]  Revision info: v2.1.0-2-g42abc38c-dirty
---[precice]  Configuring preCICE with configuration "./precice-config.xml"
---[precice]  I am participant "Calculix"
Set ID Found 
Read data 'Forces0' found with ID # '2'.
Write data 'Displacements0' found with ID # '3'.
---[precice]  Setting up master communication to coupling partner/s
---[precice]  Masters are connected
---[precice]  Setting up preliminary slaves communication to coupling partner/s
---[precice]  Prepare partition for mesh Solid
---[precice]  Gather mesh Solid
---[precice]  Send global mesh Solid
---[precice]  Setting up slaves communication to coupling partner/s
---[precice]  Slaves are connected
ASSERTION FAILED
  Location:          void precice::acceleration::Acceleration::checkDataIDs(const DataMap&) const
  File:              /home/prasad/Downloads/precice/src/acceleration/Acceleration.cpp:12
  Rank:              0
  Failed expression: valid
  Argument 0: Data with ID 2 unknown.

P.S: Not really sure what to name the topic, so please feel free to improve it or make suggestions.

2

Thank you, @Alphaoo1, but I assume you wanted to open an issue on GitHub: https://github.com/precice/precice/issues

You can consider Gitter an alternative for Discourse for “support requests”, while GitHub is for bug reports (and “feature requests”), as these things are directly related to the code itself.

3

@Makis Ah ok. I will open the feature request on github.
Sorry for the mix up. :sweat_smile:

This topic can be closed then. :grin: