Results comparison for breaking dam 2D

Official adapters and tutorials
,
1

Hi everyone,
Thank you for your help with my recent PRs on GitHub regarding the G+Smo adapter. I’m currently preparing another PR for the breaking dam 2D tutorial, where CalculiX is the only available solid participant.

Before submitting, I would like to confirm something: the only post-processing information I currently have for comparison is the screenshot at 0.6s.

Is this sufficient for validating the tutorial, or is there additional data I should consider for a more comprehensive comparison?

Thanks for your help!

Best,
Jingya

2

Hi :wave:

Indeed, we currently only have the one screenshot. I think it would be good to add a watchpoint at the tip of the flap and then compare CalculiX against G+Smo.
If you don’t have CalculiX set up, we could help with this.

Benjamin