# Overset grid coupling of codes

**URL:** <https://precice.discourse.group/t/overset-grid-coupling-of-codes/269>\
**Category:** Is preCICE for me?\
**Tags:** overset\
**Created:** [July 3, 2020, 12:19pm UTC](https://precice.discourse.group/t/overset-grid-coupling-of-codes/269 "2020-07-03T12:19:45Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 2

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Makis](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/precice.discourse.group/makis/32/25_2.png) [@Makis](https://precice.discourse.group/u/Makis)\
**Post date:** [July 3, 2020, 3:09pm UTC](https://precice.discourse.group/t/overset-grid-coupling-of-codes/269/2 "2020-07-03T15:09:01Z")

</div>

@menno it sounds like the preCICE library is indeed something for you.

> [@menno](#):
>
> Each solver _has their own process(es) and grid_

That’s exactly what preCICE expects.

> [@menno](#):
>
> except that - as far as I can see - the coupling is only surface/interface based?

preCICE is primarily designed with surface coupling in mind, but some users have also successfully used preCICE for volume coupling. Read more in [Can preCICE be used for volume coupling?](https://precice.discourse.group/t/can-precice-be-used-for-volume-coupling/27).

I am not sure what or how exactly you would like to couple inside the domain (for overset grids), but maybe it also helps to read [FSI simulations with overset grid in OpenFOAM](https://precice.discourse.group/t/fsi-simulations-with-overset-grid-in-openfoam/237) (FSI where the interface is part of an overset grid).

Does this answer your question? Feel free to add a figure decsribing your problem, to discuss more details.

---

_[View the full topic](https://precice.discourse.group/t/overset-grid-coupling-of-codes/269)._
