# OpenFOAM adapter with RBFMeshMotionSolver

**URL:** <https://precice.discourse.group/t/openfoam-adapter-with-rbfmeshmotionsolver/1311>\
**Category:** Official adapters and tutorials\
**Tags:** openfoam, adapters, fsi\
**Created:** [February 25, 2023, 11:00am UTC](https://precice.discourse.group/t/openfoam-adapter-with-rbfmeshmotionsolver/1311 "2023-02-25T11:00:43Z")\
**Posts on this page:** 1\
**Showing post:** 3

<div class="post-metadata">

**Author:** ![Makis](https://yyz2.discourse-cdn.com/free1/user_avatar/precice.discourse.group/makis/32/25_2.png) [@Makis](https://precice.discourse.group/u/Makis)\
**Post date:** [March 20, 2023, 5:53am UTC](https://precice.discourse.group/t/openfoam-adapter-with-rbfmeshmotionsolver/1311/3 "2023-03-20T05:53:11Z")

</div>

> [@Claudio](#):
>
> I generally use 2 interfaces, one on _faceCenters_ to write **forces** and one on _faceNodes_ to read **displacements**.

Could be. We started with support only for `pointDisplacement`, and `cellDisplacement` was added later. I am not sure what restrictions `rbfMeshMotionSolver` has. But if you say that it works with `pointDispalcement` (correct?), then we should probably document that.

---

_[View the full topic](https://precice.discourse.group/t/openfoam-adapter-with-rbfmeshmotionsolver/1311)._
